Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Browse

ICE Unveils Nationwide Surveillance Using Facial Recognition and Phone Tracking

ICE Unveils Nationwide Surveillance Using Facial Recognition and Phone Tracking
View gallery

Federal immigration authorities quietly assembled a nationwide surveillance web that tracked immigrants, protesters and ordinary Americans using facial recognition apps, phone location dragnets and license-plate databases, according to newly published records and interviews with people monitored by the system americanimmigrationcouncil +1. The tools were funded by a 2025 ICE budget that civil-liberties advocates said surged to $28.7 billion, nearly triple the previous year nytimes.

How ICE’s Surveillance Machine Works

Over the past two years, Immigration and Customs Enforcement has layered commercial data feeds on top of government databases, buying access to phone-location services like PenLink’s Webloc and Tangles, automatic license-plate reader (ALPR) networks, social media monitoring tools and powerful analytics platforms from Palantir politico +2. With Webloc and Tangles, agents could geofence whole neighborhoods, log every device that appeared and then follow those phones as they moved between workplaces, homes and community spaces, creating detailed maps of people’s daily lives without a carrier warrant brennancenter +1. A mobile license-plate app tied to vast commercial camera networks let officers point a phone at a plate and instantly see travel histories and associated names, while thousands of ALPR searches by local police were tagged with “immigration” or “ICE” in logs obtained by reporters mprnews +1.

At street level, agents increasingly relied on a smartphone biometric tool called Mobile Fortify, which scanned a person’s face or fingerprints and queried border and immigration databases in real time, a capability internal emails said “empowers users with real‑time biometric identity verification” using just an ICE-issued phone theconversation. Public procurement records also showed ICE paying about $825,000 for vehicles that can host cell-site simulators — fake cell towers often used to scoop up data from every phone in range subscriber. Civil-liberties advocates argued these systems, combined with artificial intelligence and big-data analytics, allowed ICE to assemble “a detailed picture of who we are, where we go, and who we spend time with,” as ACLU attorney Nathan Freed Wessler put it wired.

Lives Inside the Dragnet

People living under this “always-on” surveillance described a chilling effect on everyday life, from protests to school drop-offs. In Minnesota, a local watchdog volunteer said an ICE agent walked up to her car, addressed her by name and told her he had used facial recognition and his body camera to identify her, even though she was a U.S. citizen observing an operation, an encounter also described by another resident who was briefly detained and released after a face scan confirmed his citizenship americanimmigrationcouncil +1. Community organizers in Minneapolis and other cities said they believed phones at protests were swept up by geofencing tools and possibly fake cell towers, prompting some to leave devices at home or avoid rallies altogether for fear that simply attending a march could flag them for immigration checks politico +1.

Reporting also linked the expanded surveillance to aggressive enforcement actions against asylum seekers and refugees in Minnesota, who were tracked, detained and flown to Texas to face deportation hearings despite having cleared years-long vetting processes aclu. In other states, school and city camera systems were searched at ICE’s request, allowing agents and local police to comb through footage of parents, teachers and children arriving at campuses or driving through town mprnews +1. Privacy scholars warned that while many tools had been justified as border security measures, their use against citizens, critics and people never charged with crimes showed a pattern of “mission creep” that blurred the line between immigration enforcement and domestic intelligence gathering nytimes +1.

The Bigger Picture

The scope and intimacy of ICE’s digital reach have already triggered pushback: some cities moved to cancel Flock license-plate camera contracts or pass laws blocking data-sharing with immigration authorities, and members of Congress proposed banning ICE and Border Patrol from using facial recognition entirely 404media +1. But with much of the architecture built on commercial data brokers and private vendors, critics said the system would be difficult to unwind and could be repurposed by future administrations for broader political surveillance nytimes +1. As one long-time technologist at a civil-liberties group warned, on a long enough timeline “any surveillance tool you build will eventually be used by people you don’t like for reasons that you disagree with” — a risk that the people already caught in ICE’s web say they are now living with every day nytimes.