California sends three AI bills to Newsom as deadline looms
California lawmakers approved three targeted AI bills governing real-estate advertising, public-college procurement and notice to public-sector unions. Gov. Gavin Newsom will weigh them as dozens of other AI measures race toward the session deadline.
AI Legislative Update: August 28, 2026
Holland & Knight Health Dose: July 28, 2026
AI Watch: Global regulatory tracker - United States
California AI Bills Face a Kill-or-Survive Vote Monday as EU Fines Start
California's flush with cash. Newsom wants to cut spending anyway. Here's why.
A late-session burst of practical rules
California lawmakers have given final approval to measures covering AI-altered real-estate advertising, generative-AI purchasing in public higher education and advance notice to public-sector unions. AB 2025, AB 2392 and AB 2656 reached Gov. Gavin Newsom after votes held from August 24 through August 26, with the Legislature due to adjourn on August 31.transparencycoalition
The three bills are narrower than sweeping model-safety proposals, but they show how AI regulation is moving into routine transactions and workplaces. That approach fits a broader pattern: research on state legislation found governance measures passed more frequently than bills focused on individual protections or transparency, which often draw more competing interests and technical disputes.brookings
Disclosures, procurement and worker notice
AB 2025 would require sellers to disclose when promotional materials for real property have been digitally altered with AI. The Senate approved it 39-1, and the Assembly concurred 78-0 before the measure was sent to Newsom on August 25.transparencycoalition
AB 2392 would direct the California Community Colleges and California State University, while requesting participation from the University of California, to convene a joint group before providing a generative-AI system to students or staff. Its recommendations on procurement standards and training would be due in 2028. AB 2656 would require state and local public employers to give a recognized employee organization at least 45 days’ written notice before developing, buying or using generative AI to perform represented work.transparencycoalition California already requires large providers of publicly accessible generative-AI systems to offer detection tools and include provenance disclosures in generated images, video and audio under its AI Transparency Act.leginfo
A larger package is still unresolved
The votes do not settle Sacramento’s AI agenda. Twenty-one related measures were still awaiting full approval in both chambers as the final weekend approached, including proposals addressing child-facing chatbots, health-care decision systems, workplace surveillance, synthetic performers and digital replicas.transparencycoalition An earlier account of the session described more than 30 AI bills facing fiscal triage after the summer recess, illustrating how quickly the field can narrow before floor votes.techtimes
The state push is also filling a national gap: the United States still lacks a comprehensive federal AI law.whitecase That leaves California balancing consumer and worker safeguards against a technology industry with deep influence in the state; Newsom has separately faced pressure over the water, energy and transparency impacts of AI data centers.latimes After adjournment, the governor will have 30 days to sign or veto measures sent to his desk.transparencycoalition