Supreme Court Upholds Mail-In Ballot Grace Periods in 5-4 Ruling, Rejecting GOP Challenge
The Supreme Court ruled 5-4 in Watson v. RNC that states may count mail-in ballots postmarked by Election Day even if they arrive days later, preserving grace periods in 14 states and D.C. and dealing a blow to Republican voting-restriction efforts ahead of the 2026 midterms.

A narrow majority preserves postmarked ballots
With midterm elections just over four months away, the Supreme Court issued a 5-4 ruling Monday upholding a Mississippi law that allows mail-in ballots to be counted as long as they are postmarked by Election Day and arrive within five days of itscotusblog +1. The decision in Watson v. Republican National Committee rejected a GOP argument that federal law setting a single national Election Day implicitly requires ballots to be received — not just cast — by that datescotusblog. The outcome protects similar grace periods in 14 states and the District of Columbia, which collectively processed more than 745,000 late-arriving absentee ballots in 2024votebeat.
Barrett's majority and Alito's dissent
Justice Amy Coney Barrett wrote for the majority, joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and the court's three liberals. "The electorate's choice is made when voting is complete, not when ballots are received," Barrett wrote. "The election-day statutes say nothing about ballot receipt, and we cannot add to the words Congress chose."scotusblog +1 Barrett also warned that accepting the challengers' theory could unravel other modern voting practices, including early voting, because 19th-century statutes say nothing about those eitherscotusblog.
Justice Samuel Alito wrote the dissent, joined by Justices Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch, and in part by Justice Brett Kavanaugh. Alito argued the ruling "creates a serious risk of further undermining public confidence in our elections" and called on Congress to address what he called lamentable consequencesscotusblog +1. The cross-ideological composition of the majority — two conservatives joining three liberals — was notable given the court's increasingly rightward tilt on election lawnytimes.
Trump calls it a "tremendous loss"
President Trump, who has campaigned relentlessly against mail-in voting since 2020, called the ruling a "tremendous loss" on Truth Social and demanded Congress pass the SAVE America Act to compensateapnews +1. "There is only one reason to oppose — CHEATING!" Trump wrote, even as studies show mail ballot fraud accounts for roughly 0.000043% of ballots cast in recent general electionsvotebeat. RNC Chairman Joe Gruters said Republicans "will keep fighting to have elections end on Election Day," while Mississippi's Republican attorney general urged the state legislature to eliminate the state's grace period regardless of the rulingvotebeat.
For election administrators, however, the decision provided clarity. "For election offices, this clarity matters," said Carolina Lopez, executive director of the Partnership for Large Election Jurisdictionsvotebeat. Congress retains the authority to act, Barrett noted — but with the SAVE America Act stalled in the Senate over a Democratic filibuster, that prospect remains dim heading into Novemberapnews +1.
26 sources
journalistsresource
Watson v. RNC: A recap for journalists of this mail-in voting case
votebeat
Supreme Court allows states to accept mail ballots that arrive after Election Day
theguardian
US supreme court upholds law to count mail-in ballots arriving after election day
kqed
Supreme Court Ruling Allows California to Continue Accepting Ballots After Election Day
nytimes
Supreme Court Decision on Late-Arriving Mail-In Ballots Grants Relief to 18 States
cbsnews
Supreme Court says states can count mail ballots that arrive after Election Day
13newsnow
Supreme Court rules on whether states can count mailed ballots arriving after Election Day
thedispatch
What the Supreme Court's Mail Ballot Decision Doesn't Mean
spectrumlocalnews
Military groups advocate for 7-day mail-in ballot grace period
bipartisanpolicy
What could the Supreme Court's decision in Watson v. RNC mean for mail voting?
scotusblog
Justices uphold state law allowing for late-arriving mail-in ballots
democracynow
Supreme Court Approves Mail-In Voting
thanedar.house
Congressman Shri Thanedar Supports Supreme Court's Decision to Uphold Voting Rights
truthout
To Trump's Chagrin, Supreme Court Narrowly Protects Voting by Mail
msn
Supreme Court mail-in ballot ruling ignites political and media clash
scotusblog
The final four SCOTUS cases
nbcnews
Supreme Court allows states to count mail-in ballots that arrive late, rejecting RNC challenge
apnews
Supreme Court rules states can count late-arriving mailed ballots, rejecting Trump-led challenge
democracydocket
Supreme Court rejects GOP bid to throw out mail ballots received after Election Day
thehill
Supreme Court rules states can accept mail ballots after Election Day
wsj
Supreme Court Lets States Count Mailed Ballots Received After Election Day
law
Divided Supreme Court Upholds Grace Period for Late-Arriving Mail Ballots
abc10
Supreme Court rules on whether states can count mailed ballots arriving after Election Day
scotusblog
Justices seem ready to overturn state law allowing for late-arriving mail-in ballots
brennancenter
Supreme Court Arguments Involved Misleading Claims About Mail Ballots
nypost
Under-the-radar Supreme Court case could end California's delayed election counts